SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(J&K) 290

J.P.SINGH
Gulshad Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Surinder Kour
Advocate For Respondent: B.S. Salathia

1. Gulshad Ahmad Bhagwan detained under Section 8 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 by District Magistrate, Kupwara vide his Order No. 33 DMK/PSA of 2006 dated 23.10.2006 has filed this petition through his father Ghulam Ali seeking quashing of the detention order, setting him to liberty and for paying him compensation for his illegal detention.

2. Mrs. Surinder Kour, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the detenue had not been supplied the material which the District Magistrate had relied upon while directing his detention in preventive custody. This omission, according to the learned counsel, violates Section 13 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978, rendering petitioners detention illegal besides being unconstitutional. She says that despite detenues being in. police custody in F.I.R No. 55/2006 registered under Section 7/25 Arms Act at Police Station Sogam, the District Magistrate had procedure to issue the detention order without thorn being any compelling necessity therefor. Learned counsel submits that similar detention order passed in respect of Tariq Ahmed Hajam has been quashed by this Court in HCP No. 536/2006 and in that view of the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top