SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 253

BASHIR AHMAD KIRMANI
Ab. Khaliq Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: G.A. Lone
Advocate For Respondent: N.H. Shah

1. Claiming to be the owners of land measuring 31 Kanals 15 marlas under survey Nos.105,610,621,624,625, 103,622, 107 situate at Rekhi Suthu Tehsil Nowgam through their predecessors in interest, the petitioners, heirs of one Ramzan Bhat, Ama Wani, Rehman Bhat and Sona Sheikh by plead that the land in question was purchased by their predecessors from the original owners namely Jawala Datt and Jagdish Chander sons of the sister of original owner Nand Lal, and had been mutated in their favour under mutation No. 157 of Seripartab Singpora where-under the whole land under Khata No.2-was transferred in favour of Jawala Datt and Jagdish Chander after deletion of NandLaPs name whereafter they sold it to predecessors of petitioners through different sale deeds executed and registered way backing in October, 1957 pursuant whereto the requisite mutations were also attested in their favour by concerned revenue officers. It is further pleaded that petitioners 13 to 16 are in continuous possession of the suit land and vested with ownership rights under the provisions of J&K Agrarian Reforms Act, (in short "the Act"). Pleading that the entire chunk of land aforesaid was notified under section 4 o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top