SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 126

Y.P.NARGOTRA
Pradeep Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Sakal Bhushan
Advocate For Respondent: Tashi Rabstan

1. The petitioner was engaged in the Indian Army as Sapper/Cook in the year 1989, and was serving in 62 Engineer Regiment. He was attached with the Station Head Quarter, Nagrota and was performing the duties of Sayahak to Lt. Col. Darshan Singh of Station Headquarter, Nagrota. The petitioner applied for going on leave w.e.f. 14.6.2001. However, on 13.6.2001 i.e. a day prior to the proceeding on leave from 1700 hours to 2230 hours he absented himself from duty. He was charge sheeted and tried by the Summary Court Marshal for remaining absent from duty for a period of 5 1/2 hours on 13.6.2001. The accused/petitioner in his statement made during the Summary of evidence stated that he had gone to Jammu city to make purchases for himself. It is the admitted case of the respondents that the accused/petitioner had himself joined back his duty at 2230 hours on 13.6.2001. The accused/petitioner however pleaded guilty to the charges. The offence for remaining absent from duty is covered by Section 39 clause (a) of the Army Act 1950, it carries punishment of imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or such less punishment as mentioned in the act. Accepting the plea of guilt of
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top