SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 199

Y.P.NARGOTRA
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Navneet Dubey
Advocate For Respondent: Aruna Thakur

1. A charge sheet for commission of the offence under Section 13 of J&K Public Gambling Act came to be filed against five accused persons. The petitioner was one of them. On being called upon to plead by the learned trial court, the petitioner/accused pleaded guilty. The statement of accused/petitioner for recording the plea of guilt was recorded by the learned trial court. Accepting the plea of guilt, the learned trial court vide its order dated 8.12.2003 imposed a punishment of fine of Rs.300/- each upon all the accused including the petitioner. All the accused including the petitioner paid the fine and thus suffered the sentence. The accused/petitioner, however, challenged the order of his conviction and sentence in a revision petition before the learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Jammu. The learned Sessions Judge vide his order dated 30.4.2004 dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner and confirmed the sentence. Being not satisfied with the order of learned Sessions Judge, the petitioner/accused has filed this petition for invoking Section 561-A Cr.P.C. The accused/petitioner prays that the order of trial court dated 8.12.2003 and order of learned Sessions Judge da

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top