Y.P.NARGOTRA
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Arun Parkash – Respondent
A- Whether error of law has been committed by the courts below in declining to grant the relief of possession on the basis of right of prior purchase in terms of sec.14 (a) Secondly?
B- Whether the issue of limitation is vitiated as being against law?
2. The brief narration of the basic facts involved is that defendants 2&3, Jai Parkash and Rajinder Parkash, who are real brothers of Sukhdev Singh, original plaintiff and predecessor-in-interest of the present appellants, were absolute owners of the land measuring 2-kanal 13 Marlas comprising in survey Nos.332/300/20/104/65, situate at village Sujalta, Tehsil Udhampur which was sold by them to Arum Kumar, defendant No. 1 vide sale deed dated 20.7.1983. The sale deed is the subject matter of CSA 30/95. Likewise Smt.Bhagwanti, the mother of defendants 2&3 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.