SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 36

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Sr. Div. Manager, United India Insurance Co. – Appellant
Versus
Noora – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: N.H. Khuroo

1. This order will govern CIMA No. 32/2001 presented by Mr. N.H. Khuroo Advocate on behalf of the appellant in terms of Section-30 of the Workmans Compensation Act, by medium of which the appellant has assailed the judgment passed by Commissioner under Workmans Compensation Act Srinagar in the claim titled Mst Noora and others v. Ghulam Mohamad Khan and another, on the grounds taken in the memo of appeal. It is profitable to give a flask back of the case the womb of which has given birth to the present appeal.

2. It seems that Mst Noora and others have filed an application before Commissioner under Workmans Compensation Act for grant of compensation to the tune of four lacs. The respondent No. 2 caused appearance and filed objections before the Commissioner. Respondent No. 1 has admitted on 17.4.1999 in the court below that the deceased Ghulam Qadir Khan was in his employment and died during the course of employment and the vehicle was insured by respondent No. 1.

3. Respondent No. 2 has filed objections. The respondent No. 2 resisted the claim in terms of the objections. The main defence of the respondent No. 2 is that the deceased was not having a valid licence.

4. That the Commissi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top