IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Hakim Imtiyaz Hussain, J.
Commissioner/Secy. - Appellant
Versus
Khati & Ors. - Respondent
CIA No. 92/2004
Decided On : 07 February, 2005
Motor Accidents - Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168 - Doctrine of res ipsa loquitur
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a claim petition for compensation for the death of a class IV employee in a road accident. The driver of the vehicle, belonging to the J&K State Consumer Protection Forum, was alleged to have driven rashly and negligently, resulting in the accident and the death of the employee.
Finding of the Court:
The Tribunal found in favor of the legal heirs of the deceased, granting compensation for loss of life earnings, dependency, shock and pain, and other expenses incurred due to the accident.
Issues: The issues included the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle, the entitlement of the legal heirs to claim compensation, and the opportunity of being heard by the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, inferring the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle based on the circumstances of the accident and the absence of evidence to the contrary. It also upheld the legal right of the deceased's brothers and sisters to claim compensation as legal representatives.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision to grant compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased.
The matter arises out of an accident which took place on 29.4.2000 at Jammu-Srinagar National High-way, Official Ambassador car No. 0468/JK0IC belonging to respondent Chairman J&K State Consumer Protection Forum was coming from Jammu to Srinagar on the eve of annual Darbar-move. The driver of the vehicle was in the employment of the forum. One Bashir Ahmed Kumar who was class IV employee of the High Court of J&K was also travelling in it. When the vehicle reached near Maghar Kot Panthal National High Way it fell into a deep gorge resulting in the death of both said Bashir Ahmad Kumar as well as the driver of the vehicle.
2. The legal heirs who are the brothers and sisters of deceased Bashir Ahmed Kumar filed a claim petition before the Tribunal on 3.8.2000 claiming compensation for the death of their brother Bashir Ahmed Kumar. It was alleged by them that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver and that the deceased was at the time of accident of 22 years of age and had further 36 years of service career and that he was drawing more than 4000/- rupees as pay per month which would have increased in due course of time. The legal heirs claimed loss of future earnings and dependency and also compensation on account of shock and pain, funeral expenses and the amount spent by them at the place of accident for fishing out the dead body of the deceased from the Nallah which was recovered after 45 days of the accident from water at Jotipora.
3. Appellant (resspondent before the Tribunal) did not appear before the Tribunal despite service. Respondent Chairman J&K State Consumer Protection Forum, however, contested the claim. On the pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed by the Tribunal in the case on 14.5.2002:-
1. Whether on 29.4.2000 the driver of respondent No. 3 was driving an Ambassador Car bearing registration No. JK01C/0468 rashly and negligently and the said vehicle rammed near about 400 into a Nallah near Maghar Kot Panthal which resulted into the death of one Bashir Ahmad Kumar who was travelling in the said Car? OPP
2. In case issue No. 1 is proved in affirmative to what amount of compensation are the petitioners entitled to, from whom and in what proportion? OPP
3. Whether the deceased had boarded the offending vehicle on his own without seeking permission to do so from the answering respondent No. 3 and as such the respondent No. 3 is not liable to pay any compensation to the petitioners OPR-3
4. Relief.
4. Legal heirs examined witnesses Nasir Ali, Ab. Aziz Dar, Ali Mohd Dar, Showkat Ali and Gh. Rasool Kumar before the Tribunal and on the basis of the evidence on record the Tribunal disposed of the petition by means of the impugned order on 15.3.2003 and granted an amount of Rs. 3,92,200/- as compensation under different heads in favour of the legal heirs of the deceased. The Tribunal found that the accident has taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle by the deceased driver and directed respondent No. 2 (appellant herein) for immediate compliance of the order.
5. The Tribunal allowed Rs. 3,67,200/- for loss of life earnings and dependency, Rs. 20,000 for shock and pain and Rs. 3000/- for expenditure on visiting the place of accident to find out the body of the deceased. The Tribunal also allowed Rs. 2000/- for the amount spent by the legal heirs on entertaining the relatives and other people who have visited their home to offer condolence.
6. Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal the present appeal has been filed by Commr./Secy. To Govt. Food & Supplies Deptt; ( Consummer Affairs & Public Distribution Deptt;) Jammu. It is alleged that the Tribunal has disposed of the matter without affording opportunity of being heard to the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.