SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 157

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT Jammu
V.K. Jhanji,Permod Kohli, JJ.
Irfan Rasool Gadda & Ors. (Dr.) - Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K & Ors. - Respondent
LPA (SW) Nos. 15/2005, 16/2005; 24/2005; 29/2005; 30/2005; 31/2005
Decided On : 27 May, 2005

Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Shah
Advocate For Appellant: A.V. Gupta
Advocate For Appellant: D.C. Raina
Advocate For Appellant: G.A. Lone
Advocate For Appellant: F.A. Natnoo
Advocate For Appellant: Irfan Noor
Advocate For Respondent: Sunil Sethi
Advocate For Respondent: H.C. Jhalmeria
Advocate For Respondent: K.L. Pandita
Advocate For Respondent: Sudershan Sharma
Advocate For Appellant: S.S. Ahmad
Advocate For Appellant: C.S. Gupta
Advocate For Appellant: S.C. Shukla
Advocate For Appellant: Y.E. Tak

Headnote:CONSTITUTION OF INDIAART.14:

       Shortlisting of Candidates for interview:-

       Rule 40 of J&K Public Service commission [Business & Procedure] Rules prescribes that where number of candidates who have applied for a post to be filled up by direct recruitment on the basis of interview is large and it is not convenient or possible for the commission may restrict the number of candidates the commission may restrict the number of candidates for interview to a reasonable limit on the basis of higher percentage of marks secured in the qualifying examination in and or qualification and experience higher than minimum prescribed in the advertisement or by holding screening test-held. It is only in event the Commission considers the holding of interview of all candidates is in convenient or impossible, commission may resort to short listing. It is not requirement of rule that in each and every case the Commission is obliged to hold the screening test or adopt a short listing criteria.

       CONSTITUTION OF INDIA-ARTICLE 14 & 16:

       ALLOCA TION OF MARKS FOR INTER VI EW:

       For allocation of marks for viva voce test no hard and fast rules of Universal application which would meet the requirements of all cases Can be laid down- However, when allocation of such marks is made with an intention, which is capable of being abused or misused in its exercise, it is liable to be struck down as ultra vires of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

       Further Held.

       Whether the selection is made on the basis of interview alone or where academice are given some weightage, there is no question of weightage to be attached to interview.

Per Permod Kohli, J.

1. Appellants in Letters Patent Appeal Nos 15/2005; 16/2005; 24/2005; 29/2005; 30/2005 31/2005; and 36/2005; are the selectees for the post of Assistant Surgeons in the Health Department of the Jammu and Kashmir State. LPA (SW) No. 37/ 2005 has been preferred by the J&K Public Service Commission.

2. All these appeals are directed against judgment dated 23-12-2004 passed in batch of writ petitions whereby selection for the post of Assistant Surgeons made by the Public Service Commission on the requisition of Health and Medical Education Department has been set aside by the learned Single Judge.

3. It is relevant to notice the resume of the facts as emerge from the impugned judgment and the pleadings of the parties before the writ court/ us.

4. 31 posts of Assistant Surgeons were referred to the J&K Public Service Commission (hereinafter called the Commission) by the Health and Medical Education Department vide its requisition No. HT(GAD)131/95 dated 11-12-2002. This was followed by another communication No. HS(GAD) 131/95 dated 20-1-2003 whereby 190 more posts of Assistant Surgeons were referred to the Commission. Three posts in the open category were already pending for selection with the Commission prior to these references. In all 224 posts came to be referred with the following break-up:

Open Merit03
SC08
ST38
RBA139
LAC23
Social Caste15.

5. On receipt of the requisitions the Commission notified 221 posts for selection vide its Notification No. 06/PSC of 2003 dated 23-6-2003. This notification confined itself to reserve category vacancies only. The Commission in its wisdom did not notify three Open Merit category vacancies pending for selection with it. The last date for receipt of the applications was fixed at 7-8-2003 by personal delivery and 14-8-2003 by post. While the process was going on another communication was sent to the Commission by the Health and Medical Education Department vide its No. HD (GAD)/Gen-53/ 2002 dated 7-11-2003 referring 206 more posts in the following maner:-

Open Merit111
RBA42
SC16
ST20
Social Caste04
LAC07
Handicap06

6. Pursuant to the afore-said requisition 209 posts including 3 from Open Merit already pending with the Commission were notified by the Commission vide its fresh Notification No. 16/PSC of 2003 dated 28-11-2003. Last date for receipt of the applications was 9-12-2003 for personal delivery and 26-12-2003 for postal delivery.

7. On the basis of the afore-mentioned references and two notifications issued by the Commission as many as 430 vacancies became available for selection for different categories :-

Open Merit114
RBA181
ST56
SC24
ALC30
Social Caste19
Handicap06.

8. The notifications issued by the Commission also prescribed the qualifications required for the post. In addition to the qualifications and other eligibility criterion as stipulated in the Notification it was also notified that the qualifications prescribed are minimum and mere possession of the same does not entitle the candidate to be called for interview. The Commission reserved the right to restrict the number of candidates to be called for interview to a reasonable limit on the basis of higher percentage of marks secured in the qualifying examination and or qualifications and experience higher than the minimum prescribed in the advertisement notice as may be fixed by the Commission or by holding screening test as provided in Rule 40 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (Business and Procedure Rules) 1980. Where the Commission considers that the number of candidates who have applied for the post to be filled up by direct recruitment on the basis of interview is large and is not convenient or possible for the Commission to interview all the candidates, the Commission may restrict the number of candidates called for interview to a reasonable limit on the basis of higher percentage of marks secured in the qualifying examination and/or qualifications and experience higher than the minimum prescribed screening t






















































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top