MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shahnaz – Respondent
2. Appellants have assailed the impugned award on the grounds that impugned award has been passed without any evidence and is illegal on the face of it. The driver of appellants, Bika Ram, has not driven the vehicle rashly and negligently but in fact it was deceased, scootorist, who has driven the scooter rashly and negligently. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Srinagar, has illegally and without any evidence decided the issue No.1 in favour of the claimants and saddled the non-applicant with liability.
3. It is useful to notice the facts of the case herein:-
The case of claimants/respondents 1 to 4 is that deceased, namely, Aijaz HussainRather, was driving scooter on 8th May, 1998 and coming from Jawahar Nagar, and the appellant No.3, Bi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.