SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 268

NIRMAL SINGH
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbhajan Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: P.S. Parmar
Advocate For Respondent: Rajesh Thapa

1. This revision is directed against the order of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu, in case titled ˜State v/s Harbhajan Singh™, passed on 30.04.2004, whereby, charge under Sections 307 and 323 RPC has been converted into Sections 279 and 377 RPC.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 15.10.2003 in the morning, petitioner was coming to Jammu at his own vehicle for domestic work. He stopped his vehicle at Miran Sahib and when he was standing with one Darshan Kumar Ishar, the respondent/accused came on his vehicle, called the petitioner and started abusing him without any reason and when the petitioner objected to it, the respondent/accused threatened the petitioner that he would be done to death and taught a lesson in the way. Respondent/accused left for Jammu. Petitioner also proceeded towards Jammu and when he reached near Upper Gadi Garh near Telephone Exchange, the petitioner stopped there having some work with Joginder Singh and when he was talking to Joginder Singh, the respondent/accused came driving his vehicle i.e. car bearing No. 5683/JK02-J at a high speed, hit the petitioner intentionally and deliberately due to previous enmity and caused injuries to the p





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top