SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 211

NIRMAL SINGH
Excise Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Hilal Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Bhat
Advocate For Respondent: P.N. Bhat

1. This revision has been filed by Excise Commissioner, J&K, Government against the order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Kathua, by which the respondents have been allowed bail in a case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.11.2003 poppy straw weighing 7 quintals was recovered from the respondents. After completion of the investigation challan was presented before the learned Sessions Judge, Kathua in which both the respondents were charge sheeted under section 15 of the Act to which they pleaded not guilty. The prosecution cited 14 witnesses to prove its case, out of which three witnesses were examined. Respondents moved an application for bail and bail was granted to them vide order dated 10.11.2004 on two counts i.e. chalan was not presented within the prescribed period in terms of Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the report of Forensic Science Laboratory sample reveals the characteristics features of Poppy plant itself is not sufficient to constitute contravention of the Act, aggrieved by which order the Excise Commissioner has preferred this revision for

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top