NIRMAL SINGH
Excise Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Hilal Ahmed – Respondent
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.11.2003 poppy straw weighing 7 quintals was recovered from the respondents. After completion of the investigation challan was presented before the learned Sessions Judge, Kathua in which both the respondents were charge sheeted under section 15 of the Act to which they pleaded not guilty. The prosecution cited 14 witnesses to prove its case, out of which three witnesses were examined. Respondents moved an application for bail and bail was granted to them vide order dated 10.11.2004 on two counts i.e. chalan was not presented within the prescribed period in terms of Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the report of Forensic Science Laboratory sample reveals the characteristics features of Poppy plant itself is not sufficient to constitute contravention of the Act, aggrieved by which order the Excise Commissioner has preferred this revision for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.