SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 259

BASHIR AHMAD KIRMANI
State – Appellant
Versus
Ram Rattan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: B.S. Salathia
Advocate For Respondent: V.B. Gupta

1. This is a Reference made by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Reasi recommending quashment of an order recorded by Judicial Magistrate, Reasi on 31st of January, 2004, whereunder he discharged the accused/respondents of offences under sections 447-A/147-R.P.C. Respondent™s counsel while opposing acceptance of the Reference contends that impugned order of trial Magistrate was perfectly well placed in circumstances of the case.

2. I have heard learned counsel, gone through the records and considered the matter. It appears that on 28-12-2003, the concerned police instituted a case against accused/respondents under section-447/147-R.P.C. with allegations that they were trespassing over State land under Survey nos. 409, 405, 358 and 341 situate at Tanda Tehsil Reasi despite concerned Tehsildar™s eviction orders under section-133 of Land Revenue Act passed in respect thereof, at whose behest the case had been registered. Materials submitted alongwith police case, include, Site-map of the concerned land alongwith statements purported to have been recorded u/s 161, Cr.P.C during the course of investigation etc. From date of institution till 13th of January, 2004, matter continued to be







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top