SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(J&K) 189

J.P.SINGH
Bhushan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Makhan Lal Raina – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Nirmal Kotwal
Advocate For Respondent: Ashok Bhan

1. This Civil Revision is directed against Additional District Judge, Jammus Order dated 22-08-2005 affirming Second Additional Munsiff, Jammus Order dated 04-10-2004 affirming ex-parte interim order dated 09-06-2004 staying the operation of Special Power of Attorney executed by the petitioners in favour of respondent Nos. 2 to 7, on 24-05-2004 and registered on 26-05-2004, during the pendency of the suit.

2. Mr. Nirmal Kotwal, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that in view of the specific averment of plaintiff Makhan Lal in the plaint that he was a migrant, his suit for declaration seeking annulment of the Special Power of Attorney executed by the petitioners in favour of respondent Nos. 2 to 7 was not cognizable by the Civil Courts in view of the provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir Migrant Immovable Property (Preservation, Protection and Restraint on Distress Sales) Act, 1997 and consequently, no injunctive relief could be granted by the trial court staying the operation of the Special Power of Attorney. He submits that the impugned orders of learned Second Additional Munsiff, Jammu and Additional District Judge, Jammu were illegal and without jurisdiction, warranting






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top