SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(J&K) 4

R.C.GANDHI, PERMOD KOHLI
Mufti Imtiaz – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Altaf Haqani
Advocate For Respondent: None

Per Gandhi J, (Oral)

1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 12th December, 2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in SWP No. 1516/2002 whereby the writ petition of the appellant has been dismissed. A few facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are that the appellant (writ petitioner) was appointed by respondent No. 1 vide Government order No. 91- HME of 2002 dated 24th January, 2002 as Drug Inspector on consolidated salary of Rs.5000/- per month for a period of one year or till such time the post is filled up under rules which ever is earlier. During the currency of this contractual engagement, the appellant approached the court by means of SWP NO. 1516/2002 seeking issuance of writ of mandamus to:

i) Consider the appellant (writ petitioner) along with all eligible candidates for appointment to the post of Drug Inspector;

ii) take into consideration the experience gained by the appellant while making the selection;and

iii) prohibit the respondents from causing any interference in the service of the appellant till the selection process completed and also to release his salary uninterruptedly.

2. The learned Single Judge after consideration of th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top