SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 249

BASHIR AHMAD KIRMANI
Murtaza Nasir – Appellant
Versus
Nazir Ahmed Wani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Javaid Iqbal
Advocate For Respondent: Mufti Mehraj-ud-din
Advocate For Respondent: M.A. Dar

1. Impugned in this appeal in an order of District Judge Budgam dated: 17.02.2005 passed in the inquisition proceedings initiated under section 50 of the Mental Health Act, where under the learned Judge while modifying an earlier order of 5.2.2004, allowed release of part pension in favour of the mentally retarded person for the reason that same would be required for her maintenance etc. Ground pleaded is that the order has been passed mechanically and without providing opportunity of being heard to the appellant, and is totally uncalled-for in over all circumstances of the matter. During course of arguments, appellant™s counsel has, besides reiterating the contents of appeal argued that in circumstances of the case the impugned order was passed in total derogation to the facts and law attending the matter, in response whereto learned counsel for respondents 2 to 5 contended that appellant has no genuine interest in the well being of the mentally retarded person and is only interested in her properties etc. Both the counsel have referred to other pending litigation between the parties.

2. I have heard learned counsel, gone through the records and considered the matter. It appears t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top