SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(J&K) 8

A.S.ANAND, I.K.KOTWAL
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Nanak Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Rachhpal Singh
Advocate For Respondent: J.P. Singh

Per Kotwal J

(1) The short question that falls for determination in this appeal is whether Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Act, 1995 applies to appeals u/s 34 of the .Jammu & Kashmir Hindu Marriage Act, 1980, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act.

(2) The appellant Pushpa Devi lost her petition u/s 12 of the Act in the court of District Judge, Jammu, on 24-2-1981 and offered an appeal against the aforesaid judgment in the High Court on 2-5-1981. Since it was beyond thirty days, the period of limitation provided for it by Section 34 of the Act, she also moved an application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of the delay on various grounds. When this application came up for consideration before Honble the Acting Chief Justice an objection was taken on behalf of the respondent that Section 5 of the Limitation Act was not applicable to appeals u/s 34 of the Act, which itself prescribed period of limitation for appeals, as its application to such appeal was clearly excluded by Section 29 of the Limitation Act. Reliance was also placed upon a Single Bench decision of this court in Sureshta Devi Vs. Omkar Lal, 1981 K. L. J. 427. The learned Acting Chief Justic
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top