I.K.KOTWAL
Suraj Prakash Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Kapoor – Respondent
1. Is the suit not maintainable because the document on which the suit is based is not a promissory note but a bond which too is not duly stamped? 0. P. D.
The document which is the subject matter of this issue reads as follows
"Rs. 40,000/- Dated ¦¦¦¦
On demand I promise to pay to Sh. Suraj Parkash Kapoor, son of Sh Jawalla Ditta kapoor, resident of Puranimandi Jammu the sum of 40,000 (Rupees forty thousand) for the value received today.
Sd/-
(Om Parkash)
Partner M/s J. D. Kapoor
& Sons, City Chowk. Jammu
Witness :
Sd/- (Harbans Lal Bargotra)
290 New Plots, Jammu.
3-1-78
(2) Whereas the plaintiff says that it is a promissory note the defendant says that it is a bond. In case the document is held to be a promissory note, then there is no dispute that it would be properly stamped and, therefore, admissible in evidence. Section 2 (22) of the Stamp Act which defines promissory note reads as under:
"(22) "Promissory note" means a promissory note as defined by the Negotiable Instruments Act; it also includes a note promising the payment of any sum of money out of any particular fund which may or may not be available, o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.