SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(J&K) 180

NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
Gh. Nabi Sofi – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.Y. Moulvi Aijaz
Advocate For Respondent: M.I. Qadiri

Heard, admit

1. The objections filed against the admissibility of the writ petition have been adopted as counter by the Learned Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has not chosen to file the rejoinder. The pleadings are complete and the parties have been heard.

2. The admitted position is that the petitioner holds the post of "Library Bearer" substantively and was asked to discharge the duties of a teacher by respondent no. 4 vide order no. 153/ 93 dated 1 -8-93. He is holding the charge of the post since 1993 and has continued as Incharge teacher for last several years on the basis of aforementioned order. Through the medium of this writ petition, he has sought the indulgence of this court for regularisation of his services.

3. It is appropriate to notice that the appointment to any service or class can be made by an authority who is empowered to make the appointments and in so far as assignment of the charge of a higher post is concerned reference to Articles 85 and 86 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Regulations becomes imperative. The Article 85 envisages that a Government servant may be assigned the charge but the authority who can exercise the power, is specifie



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top