1999 Supreme(J&K) 99
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
G.L. Raina,Syed Bashir-ud-Din, JJ.
State Of J&K Through District Magistrate Budgam - Appellant
Versus
Gh. Mohi-ud-Din - Respondent
LPA No. 332/1997
Decided On : 02 April, 1999
Advocate For Appellant: M.I. Qadiri
Advocate For Respondent: Nemo
Headnote:J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 - Section 13 - Subjective Satisfaction - Satisfaction required by the preventive detention law is the satisfaction of the detaining authority and not the satisfaction of the court. The courts .have no power to determine the sufficiency of the reasons which induced the authority to issue the order. It is the subjective satisfaction that determines the concerned authorities approach. (Para 8)
2. The preventive detention of the detenue came to be ordered for eighteen months on the grounds:
"You are born and brought up in village Rawalpora Tehsil Beerwa. You have received education upto 9th and are presently working as Mason in Srinagar. You are in active, dedicated and staunch member of JKLF, an outlawed organisation having its Hqrs. in POK/ PAK. The aim and object of the organisation is to secede the State of J&K from Union of India through armed struggle. To achieve this goal the organisation has phased its programme in different stages i.e. to motivate Kashmiri Muslim youth to join their organisation and to work for it, to send them to POK/ PAK for attaining armed training in handling of sophisticated arms/ ammunition and explosives and to indulge the arms/ arm provided to them, in subversive and disruptive activities in the valley to circulate and distribute the anti-national literature among people to kill the digrtitaries and to attack at security forces with intention to kill them, to indulge in extortion of money from local civil population to set ablaze the civil and private property with intention to liberate the State of J&K from Union of India by resorting to an armed struggle in the valley. That the JUM militants threatened you and you were forced to work with them. You denied to do so, by keeping in view the conditions of your family member. To save your life from JUM militants, you joined the JKLF on 1991. You were sent to Muzzafarbad for attaining in handling of sophisticated arms/ amm, explosive in July 1991. After completion of the said training you were provided with arms/ ammn, in indulging the terrorist and subversive activities. You were infiltrated to the valley in the year Sept. 1991. After return from across you indulged in subversive and disruptive activities in the valley for a period of six months. After then you started your own work of Masonry in the city and other places, till your apprehension. From the above mentioned facts it is clear that your activities are highly judicial to the security of the State. No doubt you are presently lodged in APLU Bgm, but there is every likelihood that you may get released on bail which will defeat the purpose to deter you from continuing acts prejudicial to the security of the state. Hence, you Gh. Mohi-ud-Din Mir Sarvar S/o Ab. Samad Mir R/o Rawalpora, Tehsil Beerwa District Budgam aged 26 years are hereby detained under Section 8 as envisaged in J&K Public Safety Act.
3. This order of detention came to be challenged in Habeas Corpus No. 71 of 1997. The learned Judge who disposed of this petition held that sufficient reasons a