SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(J&K) 176

G.L.RAINA
Mohd. Ashraf Gilkar – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: G.A. Lone
Advocate For Respondent: G.J. Balla

1. For the construction of the ground floor of its office complex at Bemina, Byepass. Srinagar, the Srinagar Development Authority (here-after SDA), issued tender notice under Sr. No. 10 of 1999, inviting tenders from registered class-A contractors/firms. The estimated cost of the construction given in the tender notice is Rs. 38 lacs. The tenders were supposed to be addressed to the Vice Chairman of the SDA under sealed covers on or before the specified date and time. The notice intimated that the tender documents could be had from the office of Executive Engineer, SDA, Division Srinagar, on deposits of Rs. 2000/- as their cost.

2. The NIT prescribed in specific two conditions: firstly that the tenders of the defaulting contractors, whose names had recently been published in various newspaper will not be entertained till the outstanding-, got liquiclated/reconciliated; and, secondly the contractors/firms who had executed such nature of single work amounting to Rs. 50 lacs during the proceeding five years needed to submit the tenders.

3. We are not concerned here at with rest of the conditions of the tender notice.

4. The petitioner who is said to be a registered A-class contracto
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top