SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(J&K) 51

I.K.KOTWAL
Vijay Ram – Appellant
Versus
Chander Prakash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: A.V. Gupta
Advocate For Respondent: P.S. Dutta

1. The appellant is an employer against whom an award in the amount of Rs. 14.250/-has been made by Assistant Labour Commissioner Udhampur with powers of Commissioner under Workmens Compensate act, 19 hereinafter the Act, under section 4 (1) (d) (ii) of the Act to compensation the respondent for his temporary disablement caused due to as injured suffered by him.

2. The respondents case before the Commissioner was that the appellant had taken him from Udhampur to village Talwada on 30-11-1977 to remove some defect in a compresser. On the following day, while he was going to the site of the appellants work alongwith his Munshi where the compressor lay, he was hit by a stone which flew high from a blast, resulting in his temporary disability to do any work for a period of five years. The appellants case on the other hand was that the respondent did not fall within the definition of a workman, as such, his claim for compensation under the Act, deserved to be rejected. The parties produced evidence in support of their respective cases and the Commissioner on consideration of the same held the respondent to be a workman employed by the appellant and awarded the compensation holding furthe













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top