S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, JANKI NATH BHAT, JASWANT SINGH
P. N. Chopra – Appellant
Versus
Kuldip Raj Gupta – Respondent
1. This is a defendants second appeal in a suit for ejectment brought by the plaintiff under the following circumstances.
2. The defendant was induced as a tenant of the premises by the plaintiff by virtue of a rent deed executed on 1st April, 1962 at a monthly rent of Rs. 125. Under the rent deed the tenancy was originally for 11 months and it was continued from year to year. Under the terms of the rent deed the parties agreed that the defendant could be ejected after one months notice to quit was served on him. The plaintiff filed the present action after giving notice dated 24-4-1967 to the defendant to quit and pleaded that the provisions of the Houses and Shops Rent Control Act (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) had no application to the present suit which was governed by the general law. The Sub-Judge Jammu accepted the contention of the plaintiff and held that the income of the defendant during the year in question being over Rs. 20,000 the suit was governed by the general law. The trial court further held that the notice to quit was valid in law and was duly served on the defendant. On these findings the trial court decreed the suit of the plaintiff. The p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.