SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(J&K) 346

RAI BAHADUR GANGA NATH
Rajab Beg – Appellant
Versus
Rathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Ab. Ahad
Advocate For Respondent: Nanak Chand

This is a second appeal by plaintiff arising out of a suit brought by him against the defendant respondents for possession over the land described in the plaint. The plaintiffs case was that the property in dispute belonged to Mst. Sundri his mother, and on her death which took place sometime in or about the year 1995 he succeeded to it and that mutation had been made wrongly in favour of the reversioners of Lassi Dar, the last husband of Mst. Sundri. The suit was brought against Mst. Rahti who, according to the plaintiff, was the grand daughter of Mst. Sundri and the reversioners of Lassi Dar. The suit was contested by the reversioners. They contended that Mst. Sundri had only a life interest in the property and on her death it reverted to them as reversioners of Lassi Dar. They relied on a custom under which, according to them, the widow had only a life interest and on her death the property reverted to the reversioners of the deceased husband. The trial Court found that 2 kanals and 8 marlas out of the land in dispute was acquired by Mst. Sundri as Nautor and the rest of the property belonged to Lassi Dar. It, therefore, decreed the suit in respect of Nautor (2 kanals and 8 marl




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top