1. Petitioner has invoked jurisdiction of this court for commanding the respondents to appoint him on compassionate grounds in terms of SRO 43 of 1994 on the ground that his father while working as Constable in the Police Department died in harness on 15-1-1986, when at that time, petitioner was a minor. It is further averred that on attaining the age of majority, he approached the respondents for appointing him, but with no success, which constrained him to file the present petition.

2. Respondents have filed reply in which it is pleaded that the petitioners father passed away on 24-1-1986 i.e. 20 years back and as per age disclosed by the petitioner in his petition, he was not born, though he has pleaded that he was minor at that time. It is also projected that now that the petitioner has attained the prescribed age, he is claiming appointment on compassionate rounds in terms of SRO 43 of 1994. It is further case of the respondents that the appointment on compassionate grounds cannot be made after lapse of reasonable period and claim to such employment is not a vested right which can be exercised at any time in future.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is the case of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document