SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 386

NIRMAL SINGH
Badri Nath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: K.S. Johal
Advocate For Respondent: S.C. Gupta

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement that he is dropping his challenge so far as the validity of Rule 698(3) of the Jammu and Kashmir Rules, 1960, is concerned and is confining his submission only with regard to the entering the name of the petitioner in Surveillance Register No. 10.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he being a businessman applied to the Tehsildar, Executive Magistrate (1st Class), Jammu, in the month of Feb 04, for issuance of a character certificate. As the petitioner earlier was residing in Mohalla Talab Khatikan, Jammu, the aforesaid officer after getting a report from SHO Police Station, Pir Mitha, Jammu, issued a character certificate dt. 20th of Feb 04, in favour of the petitioner mentioning therein that the petitioner bears a good moral character. The petitioner thereafter applied before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jammu, for issuance of character certificate which was issued in his favour vide No. PHS/CV/08/199 dt. 15th of Sept 08, wherein it has been mentioned as under:-

As reported by SHO Police Station Trikuta Nagar, Jammu, Badri Nath S/o Late Sh. Garib Dass R/o H. No. 28/5 Trikuta Nagar, Jammu, was invol





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top