J.P.SINGH
Mohd. Rafiq – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. District Magistrate Samba has filed his counter affidavit in response to the petition, bare reading whereof demonstrates that he has not taken care to meet the grounds which the petitioner has raised in his petition. Petitioners plea that he had not been supplied the material including the copies of FIRs relied upon by the detaining authority while passing the detention order, as it appears in parahraph no.5 of the petition, has gone un-controverted as the cryptic affidavit filed by the District Magistrate does not contain even a whisper about the petitioners plea.
3. Mr. S. C. Gu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.