SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 366

J.P.SINGH
Mohd. Rafiq – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Sunil Sethi
Advocate For Respondent: S.C. Gupta

1. Petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition through his wife seeking quashing of District Magistrate Sambas order No. 06/PSA of 2008 dated 09.06.2008, saying that his detention in preventive custody is illegal as, while detaining the petitioner, respondents had not complied with the requirements of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India, in that, the material relied upon by the detaining authority including the copies of the FIRs referred in the grounds of detention, had not been supplied to the detenue thereby depriving him of his right to make effective representation against his detention.

2. District Magistrate Samba has filed his counter affidavit in response to the petition, bare reading whereof demonstrates that he has not taken care to meet the grounds which the petitioner has raised in his petition. Petitioners plea that he had not been supplied the material including the copies of FIRs relied upon by the detaining authority while passing the detention order, as it appears in parahraph no.5 of the petition, has gone un-controverted as the cryptic affidavit filed by the District Magistrate does not contain even a whisper about the petitioners plea.

3. Mr. S. C. Gu








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top