SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 407

SUNIL HALI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Ajay Sharma
Advocate For Respondent: A.V. Gupta
Advocate For Respondent: Swati Gupta

1. This application has been preferred by the applicant-Union of India seeking recovery of an amount of Rs. 10,35,805/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the respondents on account of solatium and interest in the case entitled as "Union of India vs. Dhanwanti Devi (deceased) and another."

2. In order to appreciate the controversy, the brief facts are necessary to be noticed.

3. Land measuring 58 kanals 14 marlas situated in village Talwal, Tehsil and District Rajouri, belonging to one Dhanwanti (deceased), came to be acquired by the Union of India. Feeling aggrieved with the compensation assessed by the Deputy Commissioner, Rajouri, ex-land owner sought arbitration under Section 8 of the J&K Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1968. The learned Arbitrator vide his award dated 06.03.1991 assessed the compensation amounting to Rs.41,09,000/- in favour of Smt. Dhanwanti Devi (deceased) at the rate of Rs.70,000/- per kanal. The arbitrator further allowed solatium at the rate of 15% amounting to Rs.6,16,350/- with interest at the rate of 4% per annum on the award amount. Thereafter an appeal was preferred against this order by the Union of India in this cour

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top