SUNIL HALI
Bimal Indu Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. The petitioner is brother of Varinder Sharma who was working as Sub Inspector in the J&K Police Department and died on account of road accident alongwith his wife. At the time of his death, Varinder Sharma was working as Sub Inspector in the J&K Police. Petitioner being the brother of the deceased sought his appointment on compassionate ground under SRO 283 of 1991. Petitioner claims that he is Law Graduate and was required to be appointed suitably against an available vacancy in the Police Department.
3. Petitioner was appointed as Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) in the J&K Police Department on 28-4-1994. The contention of the petitioner in the writ petition is that his appointment order as ASI in the J&K Police was not suitable as required under rules more particularly when similarly situated persons were appointed as Sub-Inspectors in the J&K Police. Petitioner has placed on record the appointment order of respondents 4 to 6. Respondent -5 was appointed as Sub Inspector though he was only a Graduate. The same holds for other two private respondents. How
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.