J.P.SINGH
Mushtaq Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent
2. Petitioners have claimed compensation from the respondents on the ground that they had laid 11 KV Aerial Line for transmitting electric energy over a thorough fare contrary to the provisions of Section 17 of the Electricity Act, 1997 (1940 AD) and had omitted to maintain the Aerial Line properly which because of its poor maintenance had remained suspended at low height for couple of days before it snapped on 14.10.1995 entirely because of the negligence and non-performance of statutory duty by the respondents because of which Mrs. Rani got electrocuted while passing through the thorough fare.
3. Contesting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.