SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 238

J.P.SINGH
Jana – Appellant
Versus
Haja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: L.K. Sharma
Advocate For Respondent: O.P. Thakur

1. Lasso Malik had two daughters, Mst. Jana and Mst. Haja. Mst. Jana, the elder daughter, claims to be the exclusive and absolute owner of the properties left by Lasso Malik, being her dukhtere-khana-nashin, whereas Mst. Haja, the younger one, seeks half share in the properties of her father, on the basis of a Will executed by him on April 3, 1964.

2. Mst. Haja, respondent No.1, had accordingly filed a suit for permanent injunction for a direction to the petitioners to refrain from depriving her from her share of the landed property and house belonging to late Lasso Malik, in the Court of Munsiff, Banihal.

3. Munsiff, Banihal transferred this suit to Collector, Agrarian Reforms, Ramban, who vide his order of April 11, 1984, allowed it and declared Mst. Haja, respondent No.1 entitled to half share in the properties of her father in terms of his Will.

4. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2s appeal against Collector, Agrarian Reforms, Rambans order did not succeed and was accordingly dismissed on September 29, 1997. Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal, when approached by the petitioners too did not find any merit in their revision petition and accordingly dismissed it vide its order of October 31, 200































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top