SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 33

J.P.SINGH
State – Appellant
Versus
Surain Singh Langeh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: B.S. Salathia
Advocate For Respondent: K.S. Pathania

1. State is aggrieved by Order dated 10.3.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class (Forest Cases), Jammu, whereby a shop/ office situated at Second Floor at K.C. Plaza, Jammu allegedly purchased by Surain Singh Langeh, has been ordered to be released on the Supurdnama of the applicant, who in terms of the order has been directed to furnish an undertaking that he shall not dispose of the property by any mode of transfer to any person, firm, corporation or company.

2. The State of Jammu and Kashmir questions the order impugned in the revision petition, inter-alia, on the ground that the order is without jurisdiction and tantamounts to interfering with the investigation, which was being monitored by Hon™ble High Court in OWP No. 496/2003.

3. Sh. B.S. Salathia, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing in support of the revision petition submits that F.I.R No.9/2001, under Sections 420, 406,120-B of the Ranbir Penal Code, stands registered by Crime Branch, Jammu against M/s Endowment Investment India Limited. The Finance Company has looted thousands of depositors of their hard earned money and the petitioner is not a bonafide purchaser and, as such, is not entitled to the rel
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top