1. The petition on hand represents a unique litigation of its kind, for, seldom one may come across a Public Interest Litigation (for short PIL), filed by a father (PIL mover for short), espousing the cause of none other than his real son, seeking indulgence of the Court to compel the State and its functionaries, to adhere to a particular qualification for selection of a lecturer, in the discipline of Pediatrics in SKIMS Srinagar, suppressing the fact that a similar controversy had already become subject of matter of writ petition (SWP 744 of 2008) titled Dr. Mohammad Himayon Gani v. State of J&K & others, petitioner wherein is his son. Facts so narrated are not only orally brought to our notice but are borne out by the record of the writ petition filed by Dr. Mohammad Himayon Gani (Dr. petitioner hereinafter), perhaps that is why, the PIL mover when asked, whether he was aware of any other sub judice writ petition involving similar cause, suddenly and unexpectedly shouted:

"My personal cases have been decided against me by Honble Justice Kakru and he has also declined to hear some of my cases, therefore he should not hear my petition

2. A glance at statement of the pet