SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(J&K) 231

J.P.SINGH
Gulam Nabi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Akbar Teli – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: W.M. Shah
Advocate For Respondent: H. Furrahi

1. Petitioners-Plaintiffs application seeking impleadment of legal heirs of Ali Mohammad Teli, defendant No.2 in their suit claiming ownership rights over land measuring 3 kanals 17 marlas falling under survey No.258 Khewat No.22 Min situated at Village Batapora, Ganderbal, was dismissed by Munsiff Ganderbal vide order of March 07, 2006, on the ground that, suit against Ali Mohammad Teli, having abated in view of his death before the filing of the suit and the abatement having not been set-aside within the period of limitation prescribed therefor, impleadment of the legal heirs of Ali Mohammad Teli, as party defendants was impermissible.

2. Appearing for the revisionists, their learned counsel submits that the trial court has erred in rejecting petitioners application seeking impleadment of Ali Mohammad Telis legal representatives as party defendants by applying the provisions of Order 22 code of Civil Procedure which had absolutely no application to the petitioners application which warranted consideration under the provisions of Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

3. Per contra, referring to Ali Mohammad Khan versus Vijay Tulsi reported as AIR 1986, Jammu and Kashmir, 2

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top