J.P.SINGH
Gulam Nabi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Akbar Teli – Respondent
2. Appearing for the revisionists, their learned counsel submits that the trial court has erred in rejecting petitioners application seeking impleadment of Ali Mohammad Telis legal representatives as party defendants by applying the provisions of Order 22 code of Civil Procedure which had absolutely no application to the petitioners application which warranted consideration under the provisions of Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
3. Per contra, referring to Ali Mohammad Khan versus Vijay Tulsi reported as AIR 1986, Jammu and Kashmir, 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.