M.L.BHAT
Kharaiti Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent
2. Petitioner was appointed as daily wager on the post of a meter reader in the P. H. E. Department in the year 1977. In the year petitioner is said to have been appointed as Assistant Inspector as permanent daily wager. In the year 1981 in terms of Cabinet decision P.D.L and T.D.L. employees were regularised and various posts were created to adjust the employees who had suitable qualification. Petitioner was regularised by respondent No. 3 on 6-11-1981. Petitioner was designated as Khalassi though he was required to be designated as Assistant Inspector. Petitioner is said to have made a representation and on 29-11-1981 petitioner was designated as Assistant Inspector. These two orders are annexed as Annexures A and B to the petition. As Assistant Inspector, Petitioner claims that he is entitled to the revised grade of 410-700 which was revised from 200-320 (old). But he was not given the said grade, instead he was given the grade 345-460 which was revised from 170-230. Petitioner i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.