IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Virender Singh,Muzaffar Hussain Attar, JJ.
Yogesh Bamba - Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondent
LPA (s) 251/2000, LPA (s) 255/2000 And LPA (s) 256/2000
Decided On : 23 April, 2009
(a) The selection/ appointing authority had fixed the criterion of calling only those candidates for viva voce/personality assessment test, who had secured minimum 33% marks in written test and not to call for viva voce/personality assessment test those candidates who had secured less than 33% marks in the written test. The authorities by calling ineligible candidates for viva voce/personality assessment test, have thus clubbed ineligible candidates with the group of eligible candidates. This act of the respondents on the face of it besides being arbitrary, unreasonable is also discriminatory thus in violation of constitutional safeguards guaranteed under article 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
(b) By calling for interview the ineligible candidates, some of the candidates who had become eligible after securing minimum 33% marks in the written test, were made to compete with in-eligible candidates who might have been allotted more marks in viva voce/personality assessment test and in process excluding some of the eligible candidates from being selected/ appointed as prosecuting officers.
(c) On the test of doctrine of reasonableness as also on the doctrine of proportionately the, change of criterion after initiating the process of selection is illegal as it does not fulfill the vowed purpose of selecting and appointing talented candidates.
(d) The selection/appointing authority had not reserved right to reduce the minimum marks of 33% and could not in law reduce the same.
1. Appellants being aggrieved of the judgment dated 3.5.2000 passed in SWP Nos. 2260/98, 521/98 and 2323/98 have challenged the same in these LPAs which are taken together for disposal.
2. An advertisement notification was issued by Director General of Police inviting applications as per prescribed proforma from the permanent residents of J&K State for the posts of Prosecuting Officers in the J&K Police in the pay scale of 2000-60-2300-EB-75-3000 plus usual allowance as admissible under rules. Minimum educational qualification was prescribed as Law Graduate from any recognized University with minimum two years practice at Bar. It was further provided in the advertisement notification that a candidate should not be more than thirty years and not less than 18 years of age on the first day of January 1997. For male candidate minimum height was prescribed 5 ft 6 inch and chest 32 inches un-expanded (minimum) and 33 = expanded (minimum). The candidates were required to be subjected to physical test and viva voce/personality assessment test. At para (6) of the advertisement notification it was provided that only those candidates who will be found fit in physical measurement test and possessing other prescribed standards will be called for written test. It was further provided that candidates who qualify written test i.e., who get 33% marks (minimum) or above will be called for viva voce/Personality/Assessment Test. The relevant clause of the advertisement notification is reproduced as under: -
"6. Only those candidates who will be found fit in physical measurement test and possessing other prescribed standards will be called for written test. Candidates who qualify written test i.e., who get 33 % marks (minimum) or above will be called for viva voce/Personality/Assessment Test."
3. This notification was issued in the year 1997 and last date for receipt of applications were fixed as Nov. 30th 1997. Re-advertisement notification was issued in the year 1998 in which applications were invited from eligible candidates for the post of Prosecuting officers in J&K Police in the pay scale of 6500-200-10500 plus usual allowance. It was further notified that candidates who have already applied for the post in response to earlier notification need not to apply again. The educational qualification which the candidate would possess was Law Graduate from any recognized University with minimum of two years practice at Bar. The eligibility conditions as contained in earlier notification were maintained. In re-advertisement notification at para (6) the following was provided: -
"6. Only those candidates who will be found fit in physical measurement test and possessing other prescribed standards will be called for written test. Candidates who qualify written test i.e., who get 33 % marks (minimum) or above will be called for viva voce/Personality/Assessment Test."
4. Petitioners in SWP No. 2260/98, SWP 2323/98 and SWP 521/99, being eligible for being considered, selected and appointed as Prosecuting Officers also applied. After selection process was over the petitioners were not selected and appointed as Prosecuting Officers filed writ petitions, challenging the selection of some of the selected candidates, who were arrayed as respondents in the three writ petitions and selection was challenged on the following grounds:
That though, it was provided in the advertisement notification that only those candidates who qualify in written test by getting 33% marks (minimum) or above, will be called for viva voce/Personality Assessment Test, but the candidates with lesser merit than prescribed in the advertisement notification were called for viva voce/Personality Assessment Test. The respondents/selected candidates were not possessing minimum two years practice at Bar which was one of the eligibility condition and that the selection process was conducted in unfair manner. The official respondents and some of the private respondents filed r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.