SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(J&K) 29

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Ali Mohd. Khanday – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Makhdoomi
Advocate For Respondent: Nemo

1. By virtue of the order impugned dated 15.05.2008 application as filed by the petitioners (plaintiffs) for recording the statement of plaintiff as their own witness has been rejected.

2. Suit captioned Ali Mohammad Khanday and others vs. Manzoor Ahmed Dar and another is pending on the file of Learned Munsiff, Pampore. After closure of the evidence of both the parties, suit has been posted for arguments. Learned counsel, while making final submissions, noticed that the statement of plaintiff as their own witness has not been recorded, therefore, filed an application styled to be application under Section 148 read with Section 151 of the CPC, wherein it is projected:

(i) that the above titled case is fixed for arguments;

(ii) that while perusing the statement of the witnesses, it was found that the plaintiff, as a witness has not been examined, due to the impression that the same had been recorded;

(iii) that in order to record the same and arrive at the just decision, the application be allowed.

3. Respondents (defendants) in their objections have contended that the suit has been instituted on 04.03.2002. After five long years, the plaintiffs after concluding their arguments are now pr




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top