SUNIL HALI
Mohd. Afzal Malik – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. In terms of Government Order No.10-DFSK of 93 dated 16-04-1993 the petitioner was directed to hold the charge of Cashier in addition to his own duties. At the time of taking over charge an amount of Rs.20,50,472.70/- was reflected to be lying with his predecessor Ghulam Mohammad Hakim. Only an amount of Rs.2,88,519/- was handed over to the petitioner. The petitioner continued to work as a Head Cashier till 23rd of October, 2001. It transpires that the petitioner had not been depositing the cash received by the department from various sale centres in the chest and the same was retained by him without depositing in the treasury. An enquiry is stated to have been conducted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.