SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(J&K) 3

A.K.GOEL
Jugal Raj Gandotra – Appellant
Versus
Yashpal Sahni – Respondent


All these revision petitions have been taken up for disposal together and will be disposed of by a common judgment as they arise out of the same case pending between the parties before the trial Court.

2. Brief facts of the cases need to be noticed in order to understand the controversy involved in the case. A suit for ejectment has been filed by Yashpal Sahni (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) against M/s. Gandotra Traders (hereinafter referred to as the defendants) in the Court of District Judge, Jammu. Main plea for seeking ejectement against the defendants was that the shop under their tenancy was reasonably required by the plaintiff as well as his sons for their personal use and occupation and their necessity is comparatively much more greater than the defendants as till date the plaintiff has been carrying an his business at Srinagar, but now with the changed circumstances and situation prevalent in Srinagar it has become impossible to carry on trade smoothly and without any hinderance there. Even the sons of the plaintiff are without any job and need immediate settlement in their lives in order to safeguard their interests in future. This plea of the plaintiff has bee
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top