1. This is a case where unfairness is writ large in administering justice. After appointing petitioner as helper by invoking SRO 64 of 1994 on 1-5-1995. Said appointment order has been cancelled on 9-9-1995 by the same officer. Perusal of the order reveals that petitioner came to be appointed as helper after relaxing age bar by the Administrative Department by invoking SRO 64 of 1994. The order speaks that the petitioner had continuously worked for seven years as on 30-3-1994 and as a result of which, he became eligible for regularization, which was done in pursuant to the aforesaid order. The said order gets cancelled within three months without disclosing reasons for the same. It is this order, which is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.

2. The positive case set out by the petitioner is that he was appointed as Daily Wager prior to 1994 and came to be regularized on 1-5-1995 and appointed as helper. The said order of appointment was cancelled by respondent -1. The basis for cancellation of order dated 1-5-1995, is provided by communication dated 23-8-1985 issued by Regional Director, Social Forestry Project in which he states that petitioners name has been wron

Click Here to Read the rest of this document