SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(J&K) 447

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ATTAR
Parveeza Akther – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Qureshi

1. Petitioner came to be appointed as Lab. Bearer (class IV) in the pay scale of 750-940 under the provisions of SRO 43 of 1994 vide Government order No. 1489-Edu of 1994 dated 17th Nov. 1994. Petitioner joined her services in pursuance of the Government order (supra) till her services were terminated vide order No. 1818-DSEK of 1999 dated 11.08.1999 by Director School Education Kashmir. Being aggrieved of the said termination order the petitioner filed this petition on the principle ground that before issuing termination order no show cause notice was issued to her.

2. Respondents have filed reply affidavit and at para 4 thereof it is admitted that no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner as in the wisdom of respondents there was no requirement of issuing such a notice to the petitioner.

3. Heard ld. counsel for petitioner. Considered the matter.

4. The petitioner having been appointed by Government order (supra) joined her services attained status of employee and her services were thus protected by the Constitutional provisions contained in Article 311 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of Constitution of J&K. Further statutory protections became available t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top