SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 371

J.P.SINGH
Balwant Rai – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Jatinder Choudhary
Advocate For Respondent: M. Bhardwaj

1. Petitioner has filed these revision petitions calling in question 2nd Additional District Judge, Jammus order September 24, 2007 deciding three preliminary issues framed in respondents suit Nos. 38/Civil and 39/Civil against him. The three common issues, which were decided by the 2nd Additional District Judge, Jammu, are as under:--

1. Whether the suit is not maintainable, as it does not satisfy the requirement of Order 37 CPC ? OPD

2. Whether the suit is hit by Order 2, Rule 2 of CPC. If so, what is its effect ? OPD

3. Whether the suit is hit by principle of constructive res judicata ? OPD

2. Appearing in support of the Revision petitions, Mr. Jatinder Choudhary assails the findings of the trial Court on issue No. 2 saying that respondents suit were not maintainable in view of the bar enacted under Order 2, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, hereinafter referred to as the "Code", in that, the plaintiff-respondent had omitted to seek the relief of recovery of the suit amount when he had filed his earlier suit seeking a Decree for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the petitioner-defendant from selling 14 shops and a house consisting of three rooms, kitchen, bathroom, l




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top