SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 95

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
J.P. Singh, J.
Sumeer Khajuria - Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondent
SWP No. 1070/2002 & CMP No.1641/2009
Decided On : 08 March, 2010

Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Shah
Advocate For Appellant: Vipan Gandotra
Advocate For Respondent: Neeru Goswami
Advocate For Respondent: D.C. Raina
Advocate For Respondent: F.A. Natnoo

The appointment of the petitioner as a Lecturer in Electronics and Communication Engineering was independent of the issues raised in the Writ Petition, rendering the petition infructuous.

Headnote:

Regularization - Lecturer in Electronics and Communication - Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission - Government Order No. 107 HE of 2003 - Summary: The court addressed the petitioner's claim for regularization against the post of Lecturer in Government College of Engineering and Technology. The court analyzed the Government Order No. 107 HE of 2003, which indicated the appointment of the petitioner as a Lecturer in Electronics and Communication Engineering. The court found that the petitioner's appointment was independent of the issues raised in the Writ Petition, rendering the petition infructuous.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought confirmation/ permanent adjustment/ regularization against the post of Lecturer in Government College of Engineering and Technology and extension of the validity period of Waiting List.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's appointment as a Lecturer in Electronics and Communication Engineering was independent of the issues raised in the Writ Petition, rendering the petition infructuous.

Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's claim for regularization and extension of the validity period of Waiting List.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the finding that the petitioner's appointment was independent of the issues raised in the Writ Petition, making the petition infructuous.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was disposed of as infructuous with the observation that the petitioner's appointment rendered the petition moot.

1. Three posts of Lecturer in Electronics and Communica- tion in Government College of Engineering and Technology were referred by the State Government in the Higher Education Department to the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission for selection of eligible candidates. Three candidates figured in the Select List prepared by the Commission. The petitioners name, however, figured fourth in the Waiting List prepared by the Commission along with the Select List. Apprehending that the State Government may allow the Waiting List Panel to expire without considering his claim to regularization in service, the petitioner approached this Court claiming inter alia confirmation/ permanent adjustment/ regularization against the post of Lecturer in Government College of Engineering and Technology, besides seeking extension of the validity period of Waiting List.

2. The respondents contest the petitioners claim saying that Stop-gap arrangement of petitioners continuance with the respondents does not entitle him to seek regularization in service and that the Waiting List Panel was not required to be operated for non-availability of any post.

3. Petitioners CMP No. 904/02 was allowed by the Court at the Motion hearing stage, providing that expiration of the Panel during the pendency of the Petition would not affect the petitioners right.

4. The petitioner has been appointed by the State Government as Lecturer in Electronics and Communication Engineering on regular temporary basis in the pay scale of Rs.8000-13500 in Government College of Engineering and Technology against an available post on probation for a period of two years during the pendency of the Writ Petition vide Government Order No. 107 HE of 2003 dated 08.04.2003. The appointment has, however, been made subject to the out come of the final decision in the Writ Petition.

5. Petitioners learned counsel submits that the petitioners Writ Petition needs to be disposed of in the light of the Government order issued during the pendency of the Writ Petition, because the rider placed on his appointment making it subject to the final decision in the Writ Petition, was a mere surplusage, in that, his case has been considered on its own merit and independent of the issues raised in the Writ Petition.

6. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and gone through the Government Order referred to by the petitioners counsel.

7. In order to deal with the petitioners counsels submission, reference needs to be made to the order passed by the State Government during the pendency of the Petition, which for facility of reference is reproduced hereunder:-

"Government of Jammu and Kashmir

Higher Education Department. Sub:-Appointment of Lecturers.

Government Order No. 107 HE of 2003

Dated : 08.04.2003.

Whereas three posts of Lecturer in Electronics and Communication were referred to Public Service Commission for making necessary selection of eligible candidates vide No: HE/GCET/86-11/93-94 dated 03.11.1997.

Whereas the Public Service Commission, communicated a panel of selected candidates on 20.12.2000, vide letter No:PSC/DR/Lect/Elect. & Com./21/98 dated 20.12.2000, as under:-

Select List

1. Amit Verma

2. Sameru Sharma.

3. Subhash Chander.

Waiting List-Open Category

1. Manoj Kumar.

2. Anil Salgotra

3. Vandana Sharma

4. Sumeer Khajuria.

Whereas the select list was fully utilized by appointing the candidates selected by the Public Service Commission vide Government Order No:13 HE of 2001 dated 16.01.2001.

Whereas one Shri Manoj Kumar figuring at Sr.No:1 of Waiting List has since been appointed after the vacancy caused due to resignation of Shri Amit Verma, vide Government Order No:350-HE of 2001 dated 06.12.2001.

Whereas other candidate figuring at Sr.No.2 has given an affidavit that he is not going to join as Lecturer in Government College of Engineering and Technology, Jammu. Hence, the said post be filled up by next candidate.

Whereas the other candidate who is also on Waiting List at Sr.No.3 ha






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top