SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 230

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Gh. Nabi Parray – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Wani
Advocate For Respondent: A.M. Magray

1. Petitioner came to be appointed as a Constable in the year 1978 and was promoted as Special Grade Constable. He has successfully undergone the training course at Police Training College, Udhampur. He was awarded Commendation Certificate Class III along with cash reward vide Order No.971 of 1993 dated 19.11.1993 (annexure `B). He was also awarded cash reward vide Order No.6 of 1994 dated 15.2.1994 by the Superintendent of Police, Special Branch, Kashmir (annexure `C). It is contended that surprisingly and unfortunately the then S.S.P. (CID) recorded the following adverse remarks against the petitioner in his Service Book on 31.1.1996.

"His long tenure in S.B. Budgam has been uneventful. All efforts to utilize him properly during the last 6 years did not bear fruit, being recommended for transfer out of CID."

2. The said remarks were not communicated to the petitioner. He has questioned the same and has prayed that the same be quashed and he be given all the service benefits to which he is entitled to, on the grounds taken in the writ petition.

3. It is contended that the then S.S.P. (CID), Special Branch, Srinagar was not posted as such from 1992 to 1995, during which period the sai























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top