SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 421

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Mohd. Akram Siah – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: S.R. Hussain
Advocate For Respondent: A. Haqani

1. Impugned are the orders dated 14.5.2008 and 7.6.2008, passed by the court of 1st Additional District Judge Srinagar vide order dated 14.5.2008. Status quo has been ordered to be maintained on spot till further orders. The order has been kept subject to variation, modification and cancellation, provided fresh facts are brought before court for consideration. Vide order dated 7.6.2008, application moved in terms of Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacation of the order of Status quo has been rejected.

2. Parties are the two real brothers, who admitted have jointly purchased 5 kanals of land (under Survey No. 3847/1064, one kanal 10 marlas, Survey No. 3847/1064,7 marlas, Survey No. 1062, 2 kanals 13 marlas and Survey No. 1063, 10 marlas). The said land stands mutated in the name of the parties.

3. Appellant (defendant) has started the construction of his residential house on a portion of the land, which reached to the slab level, respondent aggrieved of the raising construction has filed suit for partition, permanent mandatory injunction contending therein, that the land is just in between the parties, until partition, appellant/defendant could not raise any construction, as the appellant can








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top