SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 74

GH.HASNAIN MASSODI
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Qazi Hilal Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: J.A. Kawoosa
Advocate For Respondent: M. Amin

1. Shri Qazi Hilal Ahmad, respondent-1 herein on 15.7.2004 while proceeding from Srinagar to Jammu in his Maruti Car, was hit by a Truck bearing Registration No. JK03-2531 coming from the opposite direction. Respondent-1 sustained injuries and was administered medical treatment at Bones and Joints Hospital, Barzulla Srinagar. Respondent-1 on 30.09.2004 filed a claim petitioner under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the appellant and respondents 2 and 3 in Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Srinagar. The petitioner claimed compensation on account of loss of earning, future capacity to earn medical expenses etc. before the tribunal.

2. Respondent-1 in the claim petition (present appellant) filed objections to the claim petition. Respondents 2 and 3 opted not to appear and contest the petition and were said ex-parte on 12.03.2005. Respondent No. 2 in the claim petition/driver of the Truck, nonetheless was examined as witness by the appellant. Learned tribunal after the issues were settled and the parties afforded an opportunity to lead evidence in support of their respect stand, allowed the claim petition and awarded compensation of Rs. 3.35 (rupees three lacs thirty







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top