SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 184

GH.HASNAIN MASSODI
State Of J. &K. – Appellant
Versus
Balkar Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Gagan Basotra
Advocate For Respondent: B.L. Chatta

1. Admit.

2. On consensus of the Learned Counsel for the parties the appeal is taken up for final disposal.

3. This is an acquittal appeal directed against the judgment of Learned Sessions Judge Jammu dated 22nd February 2006 in case titled State v. Balkar Singh and others (File No. 95/Sessions) under Section 3 EAO and Section 7/25 Arms Act. The appeal arises in the following circumstances:-

4. The troops of 143 Bn. BSF on 29th August 2001 noticed movement of two persons near sub distributory No. 17 of India Pakistan Border. The suspected were allegedly called by Sh. Raja Ram and Satish Kumar --BSF personnel, were upon the suspected made an attempt to run away but were given a chase and caught by BSF personnel. Shri A.K. Pandey Coy Commander was informed and suspects -accused 1 and 2 questioned. The accused allegedly spilled beans and admitted to have concealed some explosives between border observation post 15 and Chowani. The search operation is said to have lead to recovery of improvised explosive devices weighing 1.5.Kilogram and 1. Kilogram and four time pencils. The explosives allegedly were brought by the accused 1 and 2 (respondents 1 and 2) from across border and concealed to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top