SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 174

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Jahangir Ahmad Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: G.N. Shaheen
Advocate For Appellant: M.S. Hussain
Advocate For Respondent: None

1. Order of detention bearing No.38/DMB/PSA/09 dated 11.12.2009, pursuant to which detenue has been detained, is contended to be arbitrary exercise of power and violative of rights guaranteed.

2. Detenue in connection with case FIR No.266/2009 is shown to have been arrested on 27.11.2009 for commission of offence punishable under Section 379 RPC, then pursuant to order impugned has been detained on 11.12.2009.

3. In the grounds of detention it is nowhere mentioned as to whether the detenue had applied for bail or there was any likelihood of want of bail. Simply it is stated that normal laws are not sufficient to deter the detenue from committing anti-national activities. In the year 2009 he has been arrested in connection with the case of theft of a vehicle. How theft of a vehicle can be termed to be prejudicial to the security of the State is not forthcoming. No doubt earlier in the year 2001 and 2006, the cases had been registered against the petitioner vis-a-vis recovery of arms and ammunition but no such allegation or imputation is alleged against the detenue in the grounds of detention from the year 2006 till the date of impugned order issued on 11.12.2009. A solitary instance o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top