GH.HASNAIN MASSODI
State – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Under Workmens Compensation Act, – Respondent
"Provided further that no appeal by an employer under class (a) shall lie unless the memorandum of appeal is accompanied by a certificate by the Commissioner to the effect the appellant has deposited with him the amount payable under the order under appeal against". The respondents herein, who were the claimants before the respondent No. 1, seek to press into service Section 31 (a) 3rd Proviso to assail very maintainability of the appeal against the order passed by respondent No. 1 on 13.8.2009, awarding compensation of Rs. 4,78,842/- to the legal representatives of the deceased workman Late Mohamad Ashraf Dar Son of Ghulam Ahmad Dar Resident of Kotipora Tangmarg. The back ground facts are as under:-
Sh. Mohamad Ashraf Dar Son of Ghulam Ahmad Dar Resident of Kotipora Tangmarg a workman with the respondents met a tragic death on 28.2.2007, due to electric shock while repairing electric line at Tangmarg. Mst. Dilshada
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.