SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 185

MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Mohd. Sayed Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: S.S. Wani
Advocate For Respondent: A.M. Magray

1. Quashment of the order No.369 of 1990 dated 17.5.1990, issued by respondent No.5, where-under petitioner has been removed from the service, is sought. -

2. Petitioner admittedly had been appointed as Constable in the respondent department on 15.3.1984, in the year 1990 claim to have proceeded on ten days casual leave with effect from 17.5.1990, on 27.5.1990 has moved an application before respondent No.5 stating therein that he had left on station leave but in daily register he has been shown absent, therefore, order may be issued for permitting him to mark his presence. When he could not get any response, he allege to have served a legal notice through Advocate Mr. Maqbool Ahmad on 27.7.1995, based on which the respondent No.5 has communicated to respondent No.4 that from the records it is found that the Constable (petitioner) has been removed from service under Article 335 of the J&K Police Manual, without giving petitioner a show cause notice which is mandatory, therefore, the order may not stand the test of law in the Court. Then again respondent No.5 has communicated to respondent No.3 on 5.4.1996 that the order impugned will be declared null and void by the competent court













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top