MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR
Mohd. Sayed Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. Petitioner admittedly had been appointed as Constable in the respondent department on 15.3.1984, in the year 1990 claim to have proceeded on ten days casual leave with effect from 17.5.1990, on 27.5.1990 has moved an application before respondent No.5 stating therein that he had left on station leave but in daily register he has been shown absent, therefore, order may be issued for permitting him to mark his presence. When he could not get any response, he allege to have served a legal notice through Advocate Mr. Maqbool Ahmad on 27.7.1995, based on which the respondent No.5 has communicated to respondent No.4 that from the records it is found that the Constable (petitioner) has been removed from service under Article 335 of the J&K Police Manual, without giving petitioner a show cause notice which is mandatory, therefore, the order may not stand the test of law in the Court. Then again respondent No.5 has communicated to respondent No.3 on 5.4.1996 that the order impugned will be declared null and void by the competent court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.