SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 77

GH.HASNAIN MASSODI
Rubeena – Appellant
Versus
Ab. Qayoom Malik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: S.A. Budoo
Advocate For Respondent: Nemo

1. Whether a mother is competent to maintain an application under section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act 1977 Svt for return of ward(s) to her custody, is the short controversy involved in this petition.

2. The appellant, mother of Master Naveed aged 4= years and Ms. Aiman aged below three years, approached the Court of Learned Ist. Additional District Judge, Srinagar with an application under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1977 Svt. (hereinafter called the Act) for the return of Master Naveed and Miss Aiman to her custody on the ground that they were removed from her custody by their father/respondent herein and she was better placed to take care of her wards as compared to respondent.

3. The appellants case before the Learned Trial Judge was that the wards were removed by the respondent from her custody on 8.11.2009 and were thereafter in custody of the respondent. The appellant in her application, after tracing the history of marital discord, insisted that the appellant under Muslim Shariat Law governing the parties in the matter of Guardianship, had a right to have custody of her male child till he attains the age of seven years and the female child till she attain























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top